<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal Debate: Decemberists, The Hazards of Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Culture Exists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:05:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereosubversion.com/?p=4476#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s funny that the only real debate going on in this Internal Debate exists within the comments posted below...

Here&#039;s what I originally wrote:

The Northeast indie turned major label folk-theatre troubadours swing
for the fences (again) and end up with an enigma of a record.  While
the seamlessness between tracks is admirable, the result is an
exhausting listen with reprises (&quot;Hazards Of Love 1,2, 3, 4&quot; and
&quot;Wanting Comes In Waves&quot;) adding little to overall shape. It&#039;s a
soundtrack to a spiderweb story best untangled on stage — not in
earphones. On the plus side, the indie-cameos, melodic guitar-work and
on-point instrumentation provide a much needed distraction from this
slightly misguided effort. For theatre-pop that really works, look no further than last year&#039;s Entanglements by fellow North-easterners Parenthetical Girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s funny that the only real debate going on in this Internal Debate exists within the comments posted below&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I originally wrote:</p>
<p>The Northeast indie turned major label folk-theatre troubadours swing<br />
for the fences (again) and end up with an enigma of a record.  While<br />
the seamlessness between tracks is admirable, the result is an<br />
exhausting listen with reprises (&#8220;Hazards Of Love 1,2, 3, 4&#8243; and<br />
&#8220;Wanting Comes In Waves&#8221;) adding little to overall shape. It&#8217;s a<br />
soundtrack to a spiderweb story best untangled on stage — not in<br />
earphones. On the plus side, the indie-cameos, melodic guitar-work and<br />
on-point instrumentation provide a much needed distraction from this<br />
slightly misguided effort. For theatre-pop that really works, look no further than last year&#8217;s Entanglements by fellow North-easterners Parenthetical Girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: But no one here wants to fight me like you do &#171; Culture Lobster</title>
		<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>But no one here wants to fight me like you do &#171; Culture Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereosubversion.com/?p=4476#comment-740</guid>
		<description>[...] a handful of our reviewers submit shorter blurbs about the bigger albums we tackle on the site. Here is the Internal Debate for Hazards of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a handful of our reviewers submit shorter blurbs about the bigger albums we tackle on the site. Here is the Internal Debate for Hazards of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul vandemark</title>
		<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>paul vandemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereosubversion.com/?p=4476#comment-728</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t dig this album. It&#039;s too long, It is to produced, and too many kids will buy this album and perpetuate tween angst all over the world. The Crane Wife was ok, I am sure they still had a little bit to do with production...Clearly Chris Walla wrote this whole album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t dig this album. It&#8217;s too long, It is to produced, and too many kids will buy this album and perpetuate tween angst all over the world. The Crane Wife was ok, I am sure they still had a little bit to do with production&#8230;Clearly Chris Walla wrote this whole album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debating The Decemberists &#171; The Hurst Review</title>
		<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Debating The Decemberists &#171; The Hurst Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereosubversion.com/?p=4476#comment-715</guid>
		<description>[...] wherein several of the &#8216;zine&#8217;s writers sound off on a particular record. The first installment features a smattering of opinions on The Decemberists&#8217; new album, The Hazards of Love, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wherein several of the &#8216;zine&#8217;s writers sound off on a particular record. The first installment features a smattering of opinions on The Decemberists&#8217; new album, The Hazards of Love, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott E</title>
		<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereosubversion.com/?p=4476#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Here, here.  I&#039;ll drink to that.  Now we just need to get some disagreements going on and we&#039;re golden.  

Not that I disagree with the reviews above; &quot;Hazards of Love&quot; is better than it should have a right to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, here.  I&#8217;ll drink to that.  Now we just need to get some disagreements going on and we&#8217;re golden.  </p>
<p>Not that I disagree with the reviews above; &#8220;Hazards of Love&#8221; is better than it should have a right to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.stereosubversion.com/features/internal-debate-decemberists-the-hazards-of-love-03-24-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stereosubversion.com/?p=4476#comment-712</guid>
		<description>This feature is a brilliant idea because of the case in point you mentioned, Matt. Everybody thinks differently, so multiple opinions of a new album--especially one with the apparent hype that White Lies has--give the readers multiple viewpoints to consider before listening to or buying albums from an artist. This is an idea whose time has definitely come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This feature is a brilliant idea because of the case in point you mentioned, Matt. Everybody thinks differently, so multiple opinions of a new album&#8211;especially one with the apparent hype that White Lies has&#8211;give the readers multiple viewpoints to consider before listening to or buying albums from an artist. This is an idea whose time has definitely come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
